WILL MARK BRAINLIEST PLZ EXPLAIN THO!! Question 7 Multiple Choice Worth points)
(MC)
Read the following excerpt from an argumentative essay. Answer the question that follows:
Critios might say that smart phones in the classroom cause too many distractions. A 2009 article in Education Magazine made just
such a claim. Although cell phones can certainly cause distractions, current research suggests that teachers and students are putting
phones to better use. A 2013 Educator Insider poll reveals that 67% of high school instructors now encourage students to use
phones in the classroom setting. Students without phones are actually at a disadvantage in the classroom. The poll lists Internet
access, spell checks, and collaboration as three key uses of smart phones in an educational setting
Based on this excerpt, what is most likely the original claim the author made in this argument?
Cell phones are awesome for many cool reasons,
Cell phones are a major cause of distraction
Cell phones should be allowed in the classroom.
Cell phones should not be allowed in the classroom

phones are a distraction.

Explanation:

he says it several times at the beginning

Hi There the correct answer to this is Cell phones should be allowed in the classroom.

Explanation:

Why Cell phones should be in classrooms because the paragraph smart phones can cause too many distractions. But it is true that phones can cause Distractions but it can help you of you phone s...That why the answer to this Cell phones should be allowed in the classroom.

americans had many intangible advantages. well since the british fought a war far from home military orders, troops, and supplies sometimes took months to reach their destinations, and the british had an extremely difficult objective. they had to persuade the americans to give up their claims of independence, americans had a grand cause: fighting for their rights, their independence and their liberty. this cause is much more just than waging a war to deny independence.

abraham lincoln, according to anyone who was connected with agriculture, represented the worst of northern politicians. shortly after lincoln was elected, south carolina seceded from the union. they along with other southern states, retained their anger. in a way, it was their own fault: the democrats were split in the south. some wanted slavery to be extended in other states that were about to join the union and some didn't want it badly enough. lincoln had a solid backing from his party: the republicans were united in not wanting slavery to be expanded.