The type of conformity seen in Sherif’s (1936) study of autokinetic light movement was most likely the result of , whereas the conformity seen in Asch’s (1955) line-matching study was most likely the result of .

private conformity; public conformity

Explanation:

Sherif's study type of comformity is likely the result of  private conformity, while the one in Asch's study was  public conformity. Private conformity is defined mind alteration or change that happens when a person take accepts the position taken by others privately or in seclusion. Public conformity is a superficial in nature, it is a change in the character or behavior  under due observation. it has no corresponding change of opinion and occurs as a result of real/imagined group pressure.  The situation in sherif's study is  very ambiguous while Asch's study is  not ambiguous

it allows businesses to raise prices on basic goods. it allows consumers to spend more money on products. it increases government revenue to fund public projects. it provides more money for government assistance programs.

explanation:

answer: are there any

explanation: