What does President Nixon imply about the United
States in this speech?
For the future of peace, precipitate withdrawal would
thus be a disaster of immense magnitude.
-A nation cannot remain great if it betrays its allied and
lets down its friends.
-Our defeat and humiliation in South Vietnam without
question would promote recklessness in the councils of
those great powers who have not yet abandoned their
goals of world conquest.
_This would spark violence wherever our commitments
help maintain the peace-in the Middle East, in Berlin,
eventually even in the Western Hemisphere.
Ultimately, this would cost more lives.
It would not bring peace; it would bring more war.
For these reasons, I rejected the recommendation that I
should end the war by immediately withdrawing all of
our forces.
It has committed to fighting for peace around the
world.
It would soon win victory in Vietnam if more troops
were added to the force there.
Its defeat in Vietnam would result in increased
conflict elsewhere.
* Its withdrawal from war would show its support for
communism

Its defeat in Vietnam would result in increased conflict elsewhere.

Explanation:

That the US should not withdraw from Vietnam, because that would cause problems elsewhere.

Explanation:

in the 1800s, locomotives powered by steam made transportation faster and cheaper. the resulting rapid growth of railroads led to the connection of the atlantic and pacific railroad in oklahoma city in 1897.

in the last years of the century, the improvement of steam-based engines the expansion and growth of railroads. this growth increased when the companies started to build and expand, such as the atlantic and pacific railroad, which connected new mexico with california, and missouri with oklahoma. many of these new networks were built in oklahoma, and these changes transportation henceforward.

president carter called the victims of kidnapping "victims of terrorism and anarchy" and added that the united states was not going to give in to blackmail. in the united states, they see hostage-taking as an outrage on the part of the islamist movement that violated the principle of international law on the immunity and inviolability of diplomats and their embassies.

carter refused to yield to the demands, khomeini used the situation to consolidate his power and nullify the challenges of the moderate wing of his government, headed by its president. the euphoria over the humiliation of the most powerful nation distracted the iranian people from the economic difficulties of their country. carter, in april 1980, broke diplomatic relations with iran and imposed a trade embargo, except medicine and food. iranian funds in the us they were frozen and accounted for to compensate the hostages when they were released and to pay the demands of us companies against iran.