1. Evaluate the extent to which rulers of Indian states could exercise power independently from the British in the period 1750–1900.

The period of 1750–1900 year was the period when the country faced the situation of  Capitalism. This is referred to as the phase when the empire faces the capitalist economy.

Rulers of Indian states did not have autonomy under British Rule.

To know more about the period 1750–1900, refer to the link below:

link

Rulers of Indian states did not have autonomy under the British Rule.

Explanation:

The amount of power the ruler had over his dominion were nominal at best and their royalty was subject to the British as they could cite any reason and annex their land from them.

The amount of power the ruler had was also dependent on how closely the British were involved in their territory.

This was to be seen in places like Delhi and Calcutta where the British influence was more than in fringes  like Kerala and Orrissa where the King still had more power.

The power of the ruler was subject to the needs and interference of the British.

i actually think that the correct answer is: the roman senate power's could not exercise complete control over the common people or plebeians.

.hope that . and can i get brainest point

answer by mimiwhatsup: c. british impressment involved attacking and boarding neutral merchant ships and forcing the captured crew to serve in the royal navy.

source: "british impressment, or practice of taking or seizing american sailors from american trading ships and forcing them into the british navy." ()