1. John Stuart Mill argues that "Utility" is the same as the removal of pain, or pleasure.
True or false

2. Mill argues that Utilitarianism holds that an action is right insofar as it produces happiness. True or false

3. Mill argues that pleasure, being the purpose of Utilitarianism, doesn't distinguish between types of pleasure. True or False

4. Mill argues that justice has no real connection to utility. If something produces utility, it does it without any reference to justice. True or False

5. Singer argues that an animal's ability to suffer is what demands that we consider them as ethical agents. True or False

6. Singer argues that although racism is clearly a position taken by those who are immoral, that there is really nothing such as "speciesism". True or False

7. Singer argues that in the same way the Eskimo population can justify its intake of animal protein as a means of survival, so can the majority of other American's. True or false

8. Norcross argues that what makes our behavior immoral is that we cause animals pain and suffering purely because of taste. True or False

9. Norcross argues that even because human infants are not capable of higher reasoning, like animals, that we should eat them as well. True or False

10. Tom Regan argues that what doesn't make our treatment of animals immoral is our use of them as resources, but the pain and suffering they feel. True or False

11. Reagan argues that if your neighbor kicks your dog, it isn't because the dog has been wronged that makes it immoral, but that you as the human owner has been wronged. True or False

12. Machan argues that animals are not to be considered for the pain we cause them because they are not ethical agents. True or False