Should attorneys be provided to defendants in civil cases as well as criminal cases? Why or why not?

Attorneys should be provided to defendants in civil cases as well as criminal cases

Explanation:

Article 48 - Presumption of innocence and right of defence of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights says that:

1. Everyone who has been charged shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.

2. Respect for the rights of the defence of anyone who has been charged shall be guaranteed.

Namely, the right to a defense as a basic right of the accused regardless of the qualification of cases as includes several individual rights, the basic characteristic of which is that they are solely for the purpose of defense.

Example of legal system where this is available is Belgium.

explanation: we can only guess at how our actions may be perceived in the future. doing something really big like killing lots of people, saving lots of people, affecting the lives of lots of people is a sure fire way of being remembered in historical records. we can also make a difference in the history records by being a small influence on something bigger, whether that is as a civil servant, scientist or artist.

of course you could argue that we all affect history just as tiny cogs in a   bigger machine.

if you mean how do people influence our opinions of things which have already happened, then simply by writing a book which looks at things form a different perspective and trying to convince people that this perspective is more accurate or truthful. people do it all the time i.e. richard the third was a terrible or was he? plenty would disagree, it's just that their views aren't the most widely known.n: