subject
History, 08.03.2020 23:38 genyjoannerubiera

Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source
when analyzing a historical event?

A. To see the event through the eyes of someone who witnessed it

B. To hear about the event from someone who was directly involved

C. To learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event

D. To understand how people felt during the period when the event
happened

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 20:00
In the mid-1800s, how did american indians often react to the us government signing treaties with tribal chiefs to establish reservations? many american indians did not accept the treaties and resisted relocating. many american indians fought for land taken away by the dawes act. many american indians bought land in oklahoma from white settlers. many american indians accepted the treaties and relocated voluntarily.
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 20:20
What potential crisis did eleanor roosevelt resolve on behalf of president roosevelt
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
Name three new weapons that changed how ww! was fought and how?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:00
Why do people place so much importance on washington, dc?me
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source
when analyzing a his...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 17.02.2021 20:30
question
Mathematics, 17.02.2021 20:30
question
Mathematics, 17.02.2021 20:30
question
Biology, 17.02.2021 20:30
question
Chemistry, 17.02.2021 20:30
question
Mathematics, 17.02.2021 20:30
question
Mathematics, 17.02.2021 20:30
question
Mathematics, 17.02.2021 20:30
Questions on the website: 13722363