In what landmark case did the Warren Court rule that an accused criminal had the right to a lawyer whether or not the person could afford one?

A. Gideon v. Wainwright

B. Reynolds v. Sims

C. Miranda v. Arizona

D. Baker v. Carr

The answer is A This question is for those who are looking for the answer.

depends on the age of the teen, many believe by the age of 16 a person should know the strong difference between right and wrong along with the difference between risky and immediate death. swimming with sharks might be dangerous but swimming with sharks while bloody meat is attached to you is just insane. even more if you have no idea what you're doing. however, no matter the age, as long as the person is skilled enough and has the mental and physical capacity to control their actions doing whatever sport they put their mind to is all that matters.

during both period congress passed law restricting the civil liberties of american citizen that meet with the overall public support is the one statement that explain the rate scare of the 1920 and 1950 is very similar