With regard to the electoral college, many states now mandate that their electors go to the candidate who wins the popular vote, fueling the argument that the electoral college should be abolished many states now mandate that their electors go to the candidate who wins the popular vote, fueling the argument that the electoral college should be continued it is believed to be the most democratic way to elect the president and vice president, encouraging states to give responsibility for elections to the federal government it is believed to be the least democratic way to elect the president and vice president, encouraging states to give responsibility for elections to the federal government

With regard to the Electoral College, many states now mandate that their electors go to the candidate who wins the popular vote, fueling the argument that the Electoral College should be abolished.

Explanation:

Instead of voting directly for the president and vice president, the citizens of the United States cast their votes for the electors. Electors are technically free to vote in favor of any person eligible to be president, but in practice they commit to vote for specific candidates. The candidate who receives the majority of the state's votes "wins" all the votes cast by the electors of that state. Therefore, US presidential campaigns focus on winning the popular vote in a combination of states that opt for a majority of electors, instead of campaigning to win the largest number of votes nationwide.

In short, the fact that states oblige their constituents to obey the popular will is a sign of how unfair this system is for the popular vote, since despite this measure taken by the states, many times the popular vote it is not respected (for example, in the elections of 2000 and 2016).

what is your question? i can you