subject
History, 27.02.2020 20:24 Rodny1047

How did the Supreme Court majority argue that "separate but equal" facilities were legal? Check all that
apply.
It was said to help preserve the peace and public order.
It was not really enforced on a day-to-day basis.
It allegedly affected only people with a criminal record.
The Constitution did not protect social rights, only civil and political rights.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 17:30
How were native american leaders and egypt leaders similar
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 20:50
Match the leaders with their goals at the yalta conference of 1945. franklin roosevelt winston churchill joseph stalin wanted to prevent future threats from germany wanted free elections in eastern europe wanted soviet against japan
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
What british actions lead to the creation of the constitution
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
Morgan is dividing 2 by 18. what will keep repeating in the quotient?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
How did the Supreme Court majority argue that "separate but equal" facilities were legal? Check all...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 22.08.2020 23:01
question
Mathematics, 22.08.2020 23:01
Questions on the website: 13722363