Identify each statement as describing Gibbons or Ogden.
Had a federal steamboat license
Had a state steamboat license
Claimed only state-licensed steamboats could operate in state waters
Claimed the federal government had power over interstate commerce

Gibbons:

Ogden

Gibbons vs. Ogden was a case that reached the U.S. Supreme Court in 1824 where Gibbons argued that he had the right to use his steamboat on a particular channel that Ogden had a state license that gave him monopoly over.

The Supreme Court decided that granting licenses to use steamboats fell under interstate commerce which is governed by Congress. The federal license held by Gibbons could therefore be used on the Ogden's route.

In conclusion, Gibbons got the right to use his license on various rivers even though the states those rivers were in did not license him to do so.

Find out more at link.

several states had passed similar laws, but they were limited to intrastate businesses. the sherman antitrust act was based on the constitutional power of congress to regulate interstate commerce.

you answered my friends question just to get the coins you didn't even give a valid response.

i think they came to washington to protest