how much a person should be restricted by the government vs. the natural rights of life, liberty and property ?
its for an essay for civics

Government Vs Natural Rights

Explanation:

The purpose of government, Locke wrote, is to secure and protect the God-given inalienable natural rights of the people. For their part, the people must obey the laws of their rulers. Thus, a sort of contract exists between the rulers and the ruled.

The social contract is an agreement between members of a country to live within a shared system of laws. ... Government is instituted to make laws that protect these three natural rights. If a government does not properly protect these rights, it can be overthrown.

Rights of the Government

Natural rights. ... Locke said that the most important natural rights are "Life, Liberty, and Property". In the United States Declaration of Independence, the natural rights mentioned are "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness

It is extremely important to know your legal and Constitutional rights. These rights are the foundation of our legal system and are in place for the protection of every citizen of this country. Failure to know and utilize these rights leads to their erosion and possibly to you getting yourself deeper into trouble.

unalienable. What's unalienable cannot be taken away or denied. Its most famous use is in the Declaration of Independence, which says people have unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness

the   square   deal   was   a   program   where   the   government gave any one   a fair   chance   to succeed

there are hundreds of postives ways to unite a country with another country here are a   few

1 peace treaty's peace treatys

are basically a document signing a allliance with one country and another.

2 gift

what i mean by this is for example how the french gave the americans the statue of libery a gift of peace.