Asound generalization differs from an oversimplification because it:
o
a. results from a complex analysis of all available evidence.
o
b. can be used to support a thesis in an argumentative essay.
o
c. is the result of a historian analyzing primary or secondary sources.
o
d. acts as a counterclaim against weaker conclusions.

A sound generalization differs from an oversimplification because it "results from a complex analysis of all available evidence".

Option A

Explanation:

The extreme form of showcasing information, as it remains out the aspects, that otherwise could have added to the overall coherence this phenomenon is termed as "Oversimplification". While having a conclusion or shaping into reviews based on a small amount of things is understood as "Generalization".

The reason behind variation of oversimplification from generalization as it omits demanding information and thus leads to conclusion that does not reflect all the results or sources from a puzzled analysis of all available evidence.

richard nixon led the investigation that resulted in alger hiss being convicted of prejury.

john locke, hope this .