subject
History, 18.01.2020 05:31 megan3226

Asingle, memorable case of welfare fraud has a greater impact on estimates of the frequency of welfare abuse than do statistics showing that this case is actually the exception to the rule. this illustrates that judgments are influenced by the

a. confirmation bias.
b. representativeness heuristic.
c. belief perseverance phenomenon.
d. framing effect.
e. availability heuristic

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
The byzantine empire weakened after asia minor
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:00
The difference between ptolemy iii and ptolemy xiv
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:00
Is harry truman considered a hero or a tyrant for dropping the atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki? (need a paragraph)
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:30
How did the supreme court decision in the slaughterhouse cause have an affect american business
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Asingle, memorable case of welfare fraud has a greater impact on estimates of the frequency of welfa...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 13.07.2019 17:30
question
Advanced Placement (AP), 13.07.2019 17:30
question
Mathematics, 13.07.2019 17:30
Questions on the website: 13722367