subject
History, 17.01.2020 23:31 joelpimentel

In this case, the court ruled that a state's refusal to pay for schooling in excess of 180 days for pupils with severe disabilities is a violation of their rights to an appropriate education.
a. lau v nichols 1974
b. tatro v state of texas 1980
c. armstrong v kline 1980
d. agostini v felton 1997

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 17:00
According to the qianlong emperor, why was china not interested in importing anything else?
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 18:00
Identify one specific example of how the enlightenment characterized a change in economic thought from the past
Answers: 3
question
History, 21.06.2019 21:30
Which fact would this be, and how might you verify the truth?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:30
What does munich’s refer to in the 13 days
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In this case, the court ruled that a state's refusal to pay for schooling in excess of 180 days for...
Questions
question
History, 04.08.2019 16:50
Questions on the website: 13722363