subject
History, 17.12.2019 12:31 Areyano8299

In the case randall v. sorrell (2006), supreme court justice stephen breyer argued that following judicial precedent
"avoids the instability and unfairness that accompany disruption of settled legal expectations. for this reason, the rule of
law demands that adhering to our prior case law be the norm. departure from precedent is exceptional and requires
special justification."
justice breyer is referring to which of the following legal principles?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 21:00
Me ! which of the following statements describes how the punic wars contributed to the development of the roman empire? a)they allowed the romans to focus more on expanding into the western mediterranean. b)they resulted in the overthrow of the roman republic and establishment of the empire. c)they marked the end of roman expansion in the mediterranean region. d) they forced the romans to reorganize their government with an emperor as ruler.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:30
The colonists accused king george 111 of the great britain of being a tyrant and made specific complaints against him.what were the two main complaints made against king george?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:00
What is the main purpose of "falling action" in a story?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
Atex imposed on imported or exported goodies is called a
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In the case randall v. sorrell (2006), supreme court justice stephen breyer argued that following ju...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 05.05.2020 08:00
question
Mathematics, 05.05.2020 08:00
question
Mathematics, 05.05.2020 08:00
Questions on the website: 13722363