The monroe doctrine could have been considered a huge gamble for the u. s. because they would have likely been unable to prevent which of these? a civil war an economic collapse trade embargoes with china europe's invasion of latin america

Europe's Invasion of Latin America.

Explanation:

The Monroe doctrine advocated for the existence of two separate spheres of influences: Europe, where the United States would not get involve, and the Americas, where European Powers should not get involved.

When the Monroe Doctrine was formulated by president James Monroe in 1823, the United States did not have a powerful navy yet, and for years, it was the British Empire the sole enforcer of the doctrine. Had the great European powers of the time decided to invade the Americas, the United States would not likely have prevented it.

answer: a

explanation:  

stocks and bonds are the two main classes of assets investors use in their portfolios. stocks offer an ownership stake in a company, while bonds are akin to loans made to a company (a corporate bond) or other organization (like the u.s. treasury). in general, stocks are considered riskier and more volatile than bonds.

savings accounts are just money in a bank- they are insured by the fdic for up to 250,000.   very little risk

the average mutual fund holds hundreds of different securities, which means mutual fund shareholders gain important diversification at a low price. which means if one stock or bond drops it will have very little affect on the mutual fund - again very little risk