#1. why is the slow growth that can result from a contractionary policy a positive effect? a. it can increase interest rates. b. it can decrease available credit. c. it can increase the money supply. d. it can decrease inflation. #2. if expansionary taxation policies are left unchecked, which is the most likely result? a. reduced profits b. reduced government spending c. reduced production d. reduced disposable income

The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "C.It can increase the money supply." the slow growth that can result from a contractionary policy a positive effect because it can increase the money supply.

The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "D. .reduced disposable income." 

In my honest opinion , i’d say franklin d roosevelt was a president that impacted our nation , i say this because fdr is voted among top three best us presidents and he was the longest serving president by 3 terms , usually presidents only supposed to have two terms increments of 4 years , equivalent to 8 years total before election time. and he established the fdic , through the 1933 banking act and he established the us , social security system , during his presidency, and established a national minimum wage , through the fair labor standards act , fdr led the allied coalition to victory in wwii and he played a major role in the creation of the united nations.