The constitution: was it an economic document?

what is henry steele commager point of view? and does he agree with beard thesis?

me! i am struggling a lot

The constitution is seen as an economic document.

For Beard “was essentially an economic document based upon the concept that the fundamental private rights of property are anterior to government and morally beyond the reach of popular majorities.”

For Henry Steele Commager the Constitution was primarily a political document, focusing mainly on the problem of federalism, and not an economic document.

They do not agree.

answer: if you like this comment you are my freind

explanation:

the answer is b. hope this !