4. describe a case in which the supreme court used the principle of equal protection
- possibly through the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment - to
expand civil rights for marginalized groups. then describe how the supreme court
used the equal protection clause to limit a program that benefited marginalized
groups in regents of the university of california v. bakke. (4 points)
for the first example, choose from these cases:
• hernandez v. texas
• bolling v. sharpe
• boynton v. virginia
• united states v. virginia
• obergefell v. hodges

the first action that caused many creek indians to turn against william mcintosh was when mcintosh a) supported the united states during the creek war of 1813–1814. b) attempted to stop the sale of creek land to the u.s. government. c) seized control of over 1,000 acres of land belonging to the creeks.

i am pretty sure it is a

c. had saved colonel cresap's family from attack by other native americans.

the romans were initially interested in expansion via sicily (which at that time was a cultural melting pot), part of which lay under carthaginian control. at the start of the first punic war (264-241 bc), carthage was the dominant power of the western mediterranean, with an extensive maritime empire