1. which statement is not a similarity that emily geiger and rebecca motte share?
a. both women were spies.
b. both women’s contributions to the american revolution are often overlooked.
c. both women assisted patriot forces.
d. both women willingly made personal sacrifices.

2. what action prevented the british from finding the letter in emily geiger’s possessions?
a. she burned it.
b. she ate it.
c. she passed it on.
d. the british couldn’t catch her.

3. how was rebecca motte’s family negatively affected by british soldiers?
a. the british soldiers occupied her family’s home and summer home.
b. the british soldiers burned her family’s home.
c. the british soldiers arrested her family.
d. the british soldiers seized her family’s livestock.

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!

the correct answer is b

hope i someone

first representative government in british america called virginia assembly