Iwill give ! pls me psss i need major quick. btw this is critical ! chris has a semester exam in spanish next week. he has a lot of material to study and has created a circuit-learning schedule to use. use this chart to answer the question that follows: the 10 day chart has three columns, day of week, time spent studying, and material to study. monday, week one, 30 minutes spent studying material a. tuesday, week one, 0 minutes spent studying material a and 20 minutes spent studying material b. wednesday, week one, 10 minutes spent studying material a, 10 minutes spent studying material b, and 10 minutes spent studying material c. thursday, week one, 10 minutes spent studying material b, 10 minutes spent studying material c, and 10 minutes spent studying material d. friday, week one, 5 minutes spent studying material c, 10 minutes spent studying material d, and 15 minutes spent studying material e. monday, week two, 5 minutes spent studying material d, 10 minutes spent studying material e, and 15 minutes spent studying material f. tuesday, week two, 5 minutes spent studying material e, 10 minutes spent studying material f, and 15 minutes spent studying material g. wednesday, week two, 5 minutes spent studying material f, 10 minutes spent studying material g, and 15 minutes spent studying material h. thursday, week two, 5 minutes spent studying material h and 25 minutes studying materials a, b, c, d, and e. friday, week two, 40 minutes spent studying materials a, b, c, d, e, f, g, and h. what can chris do to improve his circuit-learning schedule? review for longer periods of time, at least 10 minutes, at the beginning of each day. shorten this circuit-learning schedule as he is studying the material way too much. spend more time on the last day, at least an hour, and study each piece of material longer. use blocks of 5, 10, and 15 minutes on wednesday and thursday of the first week.

a, both were musicians during the jazz age

board of education v. earls, 536 u.s. 822 (2002), was a united states supreme court case in which the court upheld the constitutionality of mandatory drug testing by public schools of students participating in extracurricular activities. the legal challenge to the practice was brought by two students, lindsay earls and daniel james, and their families against the school board of tecumseh, oklahoma, alleging that their policy requiring students to consent to random urinalysis testing for drug use violated the fourth amendment to the united states constitution.

the student activities drug testing policy adopted by the tecumseh, oklahoma school district requires all middle and high school students to consent to urinalysis testing for drugs in order to participate in any extracurricular activity. two tecumseh high school students and their parents brought suit, alleging that the policy violates the fourth amendment. the district court granted the school district summary judgment. in reversing, the court of appeals held that the policy violated the fourth amendment. the appellate court concluded that before imposing a suspicionless drug-testing program a school should demonstrate some identifiable drug abuse problem among a sufficient number of those tested, such that testing that group will actually redress its drug problem, which the school district failed to demonstrate.

in a majority opinion delivered by justice clarence thomas, the court held that students in extracurricular activities had a diminished expectation of privacy, and that the policy furthered an important interest of the school in preventing drug use among students. this rationale was based on the precedent vernonia school district 47j v. acton (1995), which allowed drug testing for athletes. justice stephen breyer filed an opinion concurring in the court's judgment.

how did lincoln abolish slavery in all the states