Libertarians and conservatives were strong critics of many aspects of lbj's great society programs. why did they think the federal government's activities during this period was better described as coercive federalism" than "cooperative federalism"? what did this critique have to do with "unfunded mandates"?

Conservatives and Libertarians opposed the Great Society’s program because they believed they surpassed the powers of the federal government which could be considered coercive federalism since the Federal government dictated the policy instead of working as equals with the State governments. Conservatives and Libertarians believed that the Framers designed the Constitution and the Federalist system to be cooperative federalism.

•an essay

•a mock-heroic epic  

•deals with cannibalism  

•introduces “sylphs” as guardian spirits  

•not a satire  

•written by daniel defoe

•written by alexander pope

•written by jonathan swift  

•criticizes the exploration of ireland  

•criticizes impulsive nature  

•criticizes the english upper class  

•playful tone  

•remorseful tone

•matter-of-fact tone  

“the rap of the lock”   written by alexander pope.

“a modest proposal”

the answer is c sharecroppers were trapped in a cycle of poverty and debt.

explanation:

one of the major disadvantages of sharecropping system is that the sharecroppers or the planters are stucked in an unhealthy cycle of debts. this happens because planters will be allowed to loan merchandise from the land-owner and will soon be paid by the farmer in his share in the farm come harvest time. hope this !

by kd