History, 01.10.2019 21:10 bellabarber204

Hurry 100 points
the fate of this question and of america may depend on this: have they said, we, the states? have they made a proposal of a compact between states? if they had, this would be a confederation: it is otherwise most clearly a consolidated government. the question turns, sir, on that poor little thing—the expression, we, the people, instead of the states, of america. . the people have no right to enter into leagues, alliances, or confederations: they are not the proper agents for this purpose: states and sovereign powers are the only proper agents for this kind of government. . i see great jeopardy in this new government.
—patrick henry,
5 june 1787
based on this excerpt from henry’s speech, why did he oppose the new government?
it gave too little power to congress.
it gave too little power to the federal government.
it gave too little power to the people.
it gave too little power to the states.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on History

History, 22.06.2019 00:40

What was the significant advancement of the caravel? a. it could sail with the wind c. it could sail against the wind b. it could sail at night d. it was motorized

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 04:00

What group elected their first democratic member of congress under the new deal coalition? a- northern blue collar workers b- african americans c- native americans d- poor southern whites

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 11:30

The government gives public funds to low-performing schools for new computers. they decide to give more money to the lowest performers, some of which happen to promote multi denominational religions. according to the establishment clause, how would a court rule on this case? as a direct violation of the clause because government institutions cannot support religious institutions for any reason as a violation of the clause because the government gave more money to religious schools than public schools as in compliance with the clause because the government's action was for a secular purpose, did not advance a particular religion, and was unentangled as in compliance with the clause because the government gave money to fewer religious schools than public schools

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 11:30

Select all that apply. the rowlatt act of 1919 was very unpopular with the indian people because it

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Hurry 100 points
the fate of this question and of america may depend on this: have they said,...

Questions