What questions should a historian ask to determine whether a source is credible? select three options.
is it relevant to the subject or event?
is the writing style clear and professional?
does it contain information that is outdated?
is the author an expert on the subject or event?
does it explain a version of how the event occurred?

The three options are:

- Is it relevant to the subject or event?

- Is the author an expert on the subject or event?

- Does it explain a version of how the event occurred?

Explanation:

The question fails to specify whether it's referring to primary or secondary sources, but speaking in general terms, a historian will, first of all, look at a source to see if it contains information that is relevant to the topic they are studying.  In the case of a secondary source it is important to know if the author of the book is an expert on the topic.  It is also important to know if the source discusses a particular version of the historical event or period in order to know if there might be a bias.

Outdated information is not an issue for a historian because they work with old documents and texts all the time.  Old sources still contain very valuable information.  The writing style is also not something a historian is too concerned about because most primary sources are not written in a clear or professional writing style.

A: is it relevant to the subject or event?

D: Is the author an expert on the subject or event?

E: does it explain a version of how the event occurred?

Explanation:

the main inference that can be drawn from jean jacques rousseau's book the social contract is: a. people can enjoy civil and physical freedom, even if it sometimes harms society.

hope this

as general terms,  indian territory,  the indian territories, or  indian country  describe an evolving land area set aside by the  united states government  for the relocation of  native americans  who held  aboriginal title  to their land. in general, the tribes ceded land they occupied in exchange for  land grants  in 1803. the concept of an indian territory was an outcome of the 18th- and 19th-century policy of  indian removal. after the  civil war(1861–1865), the policy of the government was one of  assimilation.