In a paragraph, compare and contrast the arguments made by the federalists and the anti-federalists at the constitutional convention about the benefits and problems of a strong central government.
i will mark brainliest

In short the Federalists supported the constitution to tackle the economic and political problems faced by America due to weak central government under the Articles of Confederation; the Anti-Federalists opposed the constitution as they fear the strong central government would suppress people and the states; however at the end a compromise was made by the inclusion of the Bill of Rights in the Constitution.

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation was unable to succesfuly manage the affairs of America. Due to defence, economic and interstate problems there was a need for a new Constitution that would address these problems. When founding fathers signed the Constitution in 1787, it needed to be ratified by 9 states to go into effect. This ratification resulted in arguments on the benefit and problems of a strong central government. Federalists led by Alexander Hamilton and James Madison supported the constitution. They wanted a strong central government to solve the problems of economy, defence and foreign affairs, and persuaded the states to ratify the new document. In that case the states would have to give up some of the powers including defence, foreign affairs and trade. One of the arguments was that the constitution only limited the power of government and not the people; they opposed the Bill of Rights (A set of 10 amendments to protect the rights of people). On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed the consitution based on the conviction that the new law would curb the liberty of people by giving too much power to the central government. Others in this group argued that a strong central government would threaten the sovereignty of states, and might become as oppressive as the British monarchy. They, therefore, wanted to make Bill of Rights part of the constitution.

pizarro staged a mock trial and found atahualpa guilty of revolting against the spanish, practicing idolatry, and murdering huáscar, his brother. atahualpa was sentenced to execution by burning. he was horrified, since the inca believed that the soul would not be able to go on to the afterlife if the body were burned.

when christopher columbus arrived on the bahamian island of guanahani (san salvador) in 1492, he encountered the taíno people, whom he described in letters as "naked as the day they were born." taíno influences survived, however, and today appear in the beliefs, religions, language, and music of caribbean cultures.

ad 1492: taíno meet columbus; “new world” gets new diseases. in the bahamas, the taíno are 125,000 strong in 1492 when they encounter the crew and the italian captain of three spanish ships. christopher columbus seeks a shorter sea route to india to spain get a foothold in the profitable spice trade.

hope this

p.s plz make me a brinties

the american revolution was by the middle and upper class, and the french was by the lower and middle class.