Colonial soldiers won the siege of boston, even though a. were poorly trained compared to the british. b. ran out of ammunition fighting in boston. c. had fewer soldiers in swigs than the british. d. were forced to retreat to bunker hill.

A. Poorly trained compared to the British

a. were poorly trained compared to the British.

Explanation:

The colonial soldiers were poorly trained and armed compared to the English army, but they had strategic advantage when doing the siege, since the Royal Army didn´t have supplies available and had a terrified town under its control, the colonial soldiers, eventhoug under armed and under trained, had the upper hand when they put Boston into a siege with the Royal army inside the city.

alliances in ww1 were different from ww2 because the entente in ww1 made up of serbia,russia,france,britan,japan and italy later america  and all allied in a sort of balance of power and too keep germany,austria-hungary,and the ottomans down. russia allied the serbians in order to exert its influence in the balkans while france allied the russians because france was still in dismay and insulted after the defeat to the germans during the unification of germany and britian allied the belgians after the germans invasion of belgium.in ww2 the alliances were in a preemptive attempt to deter any further wars into happening while germany and italy allied since they were insulted and humiliated after the previous war while also sharing a similar ideology of facsim along with japan which all 3 had a want for world domination and agreed to assist one another in the endevours 

explanation: