Which of the following statements about ruling-elite theory is least accurate?
it argues that members of the elite generally have greater access to political officials and political offices than other americans.
it argues that members of the elite wield political power disproportionate to their numerical size.
it argues that members of the elite are often able to influence public policy to their own advantage.
empirical findings have demonstrated that members of the elite are more likely to trample over civil liberties than americans with less wealth or education.
it argues that members of the elite tend to be better informed about political affairs than other americans.

answer: i think the answer is b.

explanation:

here are some major conflicts i found. maybe pick one and do more research on it. (cause i ain't writing 6 paragraphs)

in 1877, the nez perce war took place.

1881 - president james garfield was assassinated.

1882 - the chinese exclusion act was passed.

1883 - a decision in the civil rights cases legalized racial segregation in the united states.

1887 - the dawes act was passed.

1893 - the panic of 1893 took place. (what a creative name)

and there are probably other topics you can find if you just search up "united states timeline," or "conflicts in the 19th century for america."

then once you find a topic you like find out how it affected the people of america and what not. (sorry if this feels a bit short changed, history was and never will be one of my strong topics)

frederick the great and the war of austrian succession. frederick william of brandenburg-prussia trained his son, frederick, to be a hardy soldier. he also declared himself king of bohemia, and maria theresa sent troops to retake bohemia. in august he led 80,000 of these men across the frontier into bohemia, his