Need on this!
which principle of the just war theory is best supported by the declaration of war? why?
which principle of the just war theory is least well supported by the declaration of war? why?

first off what is a just war? a just war can only be waged as a last resort. all non-violent options must be exhausted before the use of force can be justified. a war is just only if it is waged by a legitimate authority.

the principle that says a just war can only be fought to redress a wrong suffered. for example, self-defense against an armed attack is always considered to be a just cause. further, a just war can only be fought with "right" intentions. the only permissible objective of a just war is to redress the injury. this principle is the most accepted within states and the most justifiable for entering a state of war.

the least well supported principle is that war can only be just if it is fought with a reasonable chance of success. deaths and injury incurred in a hopeless cause are not morally justifiable. some smaller states or terrorist organizations may enter a state of war although numerically outnumbered as well as falling short in the department of military power. some radicals or overly patriotic states may enter a state of war knowingly risking the lives of thousands and potentially even millions.

answer: hamilton

explanation:

warfare was the primary means of cultural transmission in both regions.