The controversial spanish-american and filipino-american wars launched the united states into the world of imperialism. after the spanish-american war, president william mckinley faced a difficult choice of whether to annex the philippines and take on the roles and responsibilities of an imperialist power or give it its independence. after great consternation, mckinley decided to annex the philippines, forever changing the role of the united states in the world. if you were in mckinley’s position, what would you have done? would you have annexed the philippines? why or why not? first, make a list of pro and con arguments about this question. you will use that list to support the decision you would make.

one was in america the other france

explanation:

"the sepoy rebellion was the result of many, many influences and stressors on the cultures of india living under british rule. in britain, it's called the sepoy mutiny on the indian mutiny, but in india, it's called the first war of independence.

the main reason is concerned to the british paramountcy , the belief in british   dominance in india political, economic and cultural life had been introduced in india about 1820."

"they were forced to grow crops that benefited the colonizing nations instead of feeding their own people."

answer: capitalism and socialism are formal economies. the major differences between capitalism and socialism revolve around the role of the government and equality of economics. capitalism affords economic freedom, consumer choice, and economic growth.

read more on -

explanation:

necessary and proper clause. the congress shall have power to all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this constitution in the government of the united states, or in any department or officer thereof.