Upon revisiting his initial ideas, a researcher determines that the evidence supports a different perspective.

what should he do next? check all that apply.

move ahead by creating an outline of his research assignment
consider whether he ought to go back to find more evidence
think about whether he needs to change his perspective
begin writing a well-supported argument
continue to develop his argument despite the evidence

the correct sequence is 1. move ahead by creating an outline of his research assignment 2. consider whether he ought to go back to find more evidence 3. think about whether he needs to change his perspective 4. begin writing a well-supported argument

Explanation: if a researcher is good and responsible has to review the hypothesis if there is evidence that doesn't support it.

genetics is the study of how dna works, the methodologies defining the new recent technologies allow scientist to have a panoramic view of the entire dna landscape, especially how genomes interact with their environment, including off course, factors outside their organisms.

thus is very possible the existence of both scenarios, where populations of isolated individuals have different genetic traits, and share traits related to genetic mutation, due rats can easily travel overseas using human transport channels. so scientists could get a vast number of data, including human interaction, evolution of rodents, health development, spread of infections, development of new organisms, how genomes evolve in different environments and so on.