How do you view this decision’s impact on election reform and free speech?

in my opinion, the Court's decision is a step in the right direction. Just as people are ensured the freedom of speech, organizations should be also. This decision also decreases the likelihood of Congress passing legislation that restricts freedom of speech in any way that could impede on private rights. All in all the Court interpreted the Constitution well in this cas and acted in the most appropriate and legitimate manner. This case and the final ruling will shed deeper insight on the true extent to which freedom of speech is assured to citizens of the nation

Explanation:

your answer is

relations between the soviet union and the united states were driven by a complex interplay of ideological, political, and economic factors, which led to shifts between cautious cooperation and often bitter superpower rivalry over the years. the distinct differences in the political systems of the two countries often prevented them from reaching a mutual understanding on key policy issues and even, as in the case of the cuban missile crisis, brought them to the brink of war.

the united states government was initially hostile to the soviet leaders for taking russia out of world war i and was opposed to a state ideologically based on communism. although the united states embarked on a famine relief program in the soviet union in the early 1920s and american businessmen established commercial ties there during the period of the new economic policy (1921–29), the two countries did not establish diplomatic relations until 1933. by that time, the totalitarian nature of joseph stalin's regime presented an insurmountable obstacle to friendly relations with the west. although world war ii brought the two countries into alliance, based on the common aim of defeating nazi germany, the soviet union's aggressive, antidemocratic policy toward eastern europe had created tensions even before the war ended.

voter turnout, 2006-2012