Why is it important to consider the historical context surrounding an event when making a historical interpretation a. events happening at the same time might have influenced one another b. every historical interpretation must consider the political and social consequences of an event. c. a conclusion that does not consider context is a generalization rather than an interpretation. d. historical interpretations are only valid if they are written in a similar context as the event.

Explanation:

First of all, ''context'' refers to social, religious and economic variables, that's why they must be included in every social event that's being analysed, because all these variables influence one on another. For example, economy is influenced by religion due to the perception it gives it (rich are mean and poor are spiritual).

On the other hand, social behaviour and events are defined by other circumstances like religion because it was set a bunch of rules of proper human behaviour according to sacred scriptures.

So, at the end, interpreting history becomes a really difficult activity because is a multi variable science.

hello there!

the graphics that you have attached within the question, indicates that few people in bolivia work in industry according to its labor force.

however, the graphic that is on the right side of the picture shows the gdp sector in bolivia. this gross domestic product is a macroeconomic magnitude   that shows the monetary value of all finished goods and services within a country's borders in a specific time period. in this case, the graphic is showing the monetary value in each sector -agriculture, industry and services- of bolivia in 2012.

so, although the first graphic located at the left side indicates that not so many people work in industry, this is the second most important sector according to the gdp metrics because of the monetary value that impacts on its country. it does not need to be the most valuable one. if it makes an impact on the country's economy, it will be definitely crucial to it.

so the story tells of someone named kaushik choudhuri, but he does not narrate the story, a girl named hema does. hema tells the story in a second person point of view because you (the reader) are supposed to be the boy named kaushik.

here's an excerpt i found: "i was ushered into the fitting room, your mother watching approvingly as i took off my coat and sweater and tried on the bra."

source: