How can personal biases and points of view influence historians when they are studying evidence

The correct answer to this question is B) They can lead historians to arrive at very different interpretations of an event.

Personal biases and points of view influence historians when they are studying evidence in that they can lead historians to arrive at very different interpretations of an event.

That is why so important that historians maintain objectivity when doing research. It is understandable that each historian has its own background of studies, preferent authors and way of thinking. But historians have to set aside all of that in order to present their investigations in an objective manner, based on facts, numbers, statistics, results that can be validated.

The options of the question are in the attached image.

answer; the above statement is (false);

well first we can compare on what the slave masters ate and what the slaves ate well the masters ate fancy great food like chicken rice mash potatose and stuff like that and slaves ate well food that your not suppost to eat like the weird parts of turkey and chicken and slaves master chilled beat and eat and slaves work get beat and get little of sleep there you go