Why is it important to address relevant counterclaims in a presentation?
to make the opposing views look negative
to put opposing views on the defensive
to reduce trust in the opposing viewpoints
to strengthen the argument and refute the counterclaim

It is important to address releveant counterclaims in a presentation to strengthen the argument and refute the counterclaim.

Explanation:

If you address relevant counterclaims you make your own claim stronger.

The correct answer is D. To strengthen the argument and refute the counterclaim

Explanation:

In a presentation it is common you present your position or main claim and aim at proving it during the development of the presentation, for doing this, it is recommended to include multiple reasons and relevant evidence that support your claim, but besides this, it is important to include counterclaims. A counterclaim refers to the opposite position to your main claim, position or thesis statement, this means a counterclaim opposes and disproves your main claim.

This type of arguments against your claim should be included and refuted with evidence, because in this way you recognize and tell the audience there are opposite positions or perspectives to the ones you propose, but you evidence is enough strong and shows despite this, your claim is stronger and they should support it, which strengthen your argument of claim. Therefore, it is important to address relevant counterclaims "to strengthen the argument and refute the counterclaim".

1) checks and balances- this idea is implemented in the constitution to ensure that no one branch of the federal government gains too much power. for example, the legislative branch(congress) can approve a bill that will then be sent to the executive branch (president). if the president does not like the bill or thinks that it violates the rights of citizens, he/she can veto the bill. vetoing the bill stops the bill from becoming a law. this check on power ensures that congress makes laws that do not violate the rights of citizens.

2) anti-federalists do not want to ratify the constitution unless it includes a bill of rights. the anti-federalists are worried that the constitution gives too much power to the federal government. having a strong central government caused problems when the us was still part of great britain. this is why the anti-federalists are fearful of this type of system.

3) federalists want a new constitution passed because it will fix america's weak political structure. before the us constitution is implemented, the constitution being used is known as the articles of confederation. this constitution has an extremely weak central government, allowing for disunity among the states.

can't do the whole thing, hope this