Describe briefly one case in which the supreme court upheld a restriction on symbolic speech and one case where it struck down a restriction?

Brandenburg v. Ohio US

Supreme Court decision maintains that seditious speech -- including speech that constitutes an incitement to violence--is protected by the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution as long as it does not indicate an imminent threat.

Explanation:

b. the 200th birthday of the united states

china is shifting toward specialization in industry and services and away from agriculture.

explanation:

mark brainliest