Which of the following is more characteristic of an activist approach to judicial review?

a judge decides not to hear a case, but lets congress deal with the issue.

a judge makes a decision based on previous rulings.

a judge overturns a legal precedent.

a judge upholds a lower court's ruling.

A judge overturns a legal precedent.

Explanation:

A judge who's an activist will mostly wants to leave its own imprint on the case.  This judge will certainly NOT refer that to Congress, nor will base his judgement on precedents nor to uphold a lower court's ruling.

He will overturn a legal precedent, trying to make a new legal precedent and re-write the law into his own views, bypassing the decisions of his colleagues in previous similar cases, and the text of the laws adopted by Congress.

C

A judge overturns a legal precedent.

E2020

the statment would be a easy nonviolent one

answer: if you like this comment you are my freind

explanation: