Michel angelo painting stile was what?

Answer

Hi,

The style was Italian Renaissance

Explanation

Referring to the period of 14th and 17th centuries in Italy, this style was depicted by an enlightened age of art and architecture caused by new culture interest. The art focused more on the belief of humanism resulting to more art pieces that showed the beauty of human form. Using artistic observation and investigations, more inquiries were conducted that further facilitated the development of technology.

Best wishes!

The painting style of Michelangelo was of fresco art nature.

Michelangelo has been though this technique since early age by his superiors. He showed great talent, creativity, and was creating excellent, high quality paintings. Some of the paintings that are considered to be the best in the world are actually painted by Michelangelo himself.

It has to be mentioned though that despite having a great talent for painting and producing some of the masterpieces of painting, that was actually not Michelangelo primary focus and passion. Michelangelo was predominantly a sculptor, and most of his artistic career was dedicated to creating sculptures, not paintings.

others, still angry about the revolution, argued against a commercial treaty with the britain promised to withdraw all of its troops from america after the in the northern frontier, however, the british refused to surrender several military posts on a stronger central government in america may have resolved these foreign.

hope this : d

the articles of confederation only set up the continental congress at the federal level. there were no executive or judicial branches except within the states. the states were allowed to keep every right that was not specifically given to congress. the bonding of the states was through a 'firm league of friendship' that best served as a defense agreement against invasion. states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations.

not many historians today talk about the strengths of the articles of confederation, likely because of how unpopular the document quickly became. the articles did set the legislative body, congress, as the highest power in the nation because of the fear of monarchy. congress had the sole power to declare war, assign treaties, entertain foreign relations, and operate post offices. disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress. the document also stipulated that canada was allowed to enter the union if they desired.

there were more weaknesses than strengths under the articles of confederation. the lack of power given to the continental congress strangled the federal government. the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws. if a state did not support a federal law, that state could simply ignore it. congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade. without a federal court system or executive leader, there would be no way to enforce these laws, either. amending the articles of confederation would also require a unanimous decision, which would be extremely difficult.