subject
History, 13.11.2019 20:31 ashleyjohnson2002

Washington had a lot to say about involvement with foreign nations. what distinction does he make between permanent alliances and temporary alliances?

this will with the question read it plz

to have revenue there must be taxes--that no taxes can be devised which are not more or less inconvenient & unpleasant--that the intrinsic embarrassment inseparable from the selection of the proper objects (which is always a choice of difficulties) ought to be a decisive motive for a candid construction of the conduct of the government in making it, and for a spirit of acquiescence in the measures for obtaining revenue which the public exigencies may at any time dictate.

observe good faith & justice towards all nations. cultivate peace & harmony with all--religion & morality enjoin this conduct; and can it be that good policy does not equally enjoin it? it will be worthy of a free, enlightened, and, at no distant period, a great nation, to give to mankind the magnanimous and too novel example of a people always guided by an exalted justice & benevolence. who can doubt that in the course of time and things the fruits of such a plan would richly repay any temporary advantages which might be lost by a steady adherence to it? can it be, that providence has not connected the permanent felicity of a nation with its virtue? the experiment, at least, is recommended by every sentiment which ennobles human nature. alas! is it rendered impossible by its vices?
prosperity in the toils of european ambition, rivalship, interest, humour or caprice?

'tis our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances, with any portion of the foreign world--so far, i mean, as we are now at liberty to do it--for let me not be understood as capable of patronizing infidelity to existing engagements, (i hold the maxim no less applicable to public than to private affairs, that honesty is always the best repeat it, therefore, let those engagements. be observed in their genuine sense. but in my opinion, it is unnecessary and would be unwise to extend them.

taking care always to keep ourselves, by suitable establishments, on a respectable defensive posture, we may safely trust to temporary alliances for extraordinary emergencies.

harmony, liberal intercourse with all nations, are recommended by policy, humanity, and interest. but even our commercial policy should hold an equal and impartial hand: neither seeking nor granting exclusive favours or preferences; consulting the natural course of things; diffusing & diversifying by gentle means the streams of commerce, but forcing nothing; establishing with powers so disposed--in order to give to trade a stable course, to define the rights of our merchants, and to enable the government to support them--conventional rules of intercourse;

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 17:30
Why hadn’t europeans used maritime routes before the age of exploration?
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 19:50
How was slavery in mesoamerica, africa, and the arab world similar? many enslaved people were forced to pledge loyalty to their owners. many enslaved people worked in exchange for protection from foreigners. many enslaved people were captured during war. many enslaved people taught and tutored children.
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:20
The middle east had been subjected to attacks from outside the middle east in ancient, medieval, and modern times. which of the following invasions by outside forces came last in the period of written middle east history before 1300 a.d.?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 09:00
Which act intended to regulate and trade?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Washington had a lot to say about involvement with foreign nations. what distinction does he make be...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 17.10.2019 01:00
question
Mathematics, 17.10.2019 01:00
Questions on the website: 13722367