Drag and drop the events to arrange them from the event that came first to the event that occurred last.
the normans invade england.
germanic tribes settle in the east of britain.
england develops a standardized system of coinage.
anglo-saxon kingdoms form.
england develops a strong monarchy.

The correct order is:  

1. Germanic tribes settle in the east of Britain;

2. Anglo-Saxon kingdoms form;

3. The Normans invade England;

4. England develops a strong monarchy;

5. England develops a standardized system of coinage;

Despite being still very debatable about the migration of the Anglo-Saxons in England, it is commonly accepted that these Germanic tribes migrated in the eastern part of Britain somewhere around the fifth century. After the migration, they managed to have large influence and gradually manage to become the most influential people in the society, forming multiple small Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms. These kingdoms were not very strong individually, so the Normans had no big troubles to defeat them and invade their land, thus overtaking the high niches in the hierarchy. After the tensions between the Normans and the native inhabitants of England were settled down, they started to work together, and the first strong monarchy of England arose. As all strong monarchies do in order to have stable and prosperous economy, the English one standardized its own system of coinage.

the answer is "by providing data about careers and annual mean wages"

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!