What was a result of the french and indian war?
a. the colonists defeated the british and the french and were free
b. the french gained a lot of british land and the colonies were more pressed for land
c. the colonists learned they didn't have much in common with the british
d. the british defeated the french but the amount of land they claimed didn't grow
?

The only correct answer can be statement C.

The British and the America colonists work together to defeat the French in the French and Indian War, showing that statement A cannot be correct.

One result of the French and Indian War was France giving up a large amount of territory to the British. This included a significant part of modern day Canada. This shows that statement B is wrong.

Statement D is also incorrect because the French lost land.

This shows how only statement C. can be correct.

C. The colonists learned they didn't have much in common with the British

hi the answer to your question is

to control offices

this sparked alotof controversy more over ending the articles of federation

a hypothesis is an expected answer to a question, usually based on some theory or prior research. hypothesis testing is a method of determining the viability of a hypothesis. let’s use the us presidential election as an example. there are many hypotheses (questions) about how people feel or whom they will vote for. the only way to know the 100% “truth” about the answers to these questions is to ask every single possible voter – something that is impossible, expensive, time consuming etc. instead, we take samples and use statistics to make “best guesses” about the answer to a particular hypothesis. we never know for sure if our conclusion is right at the time we accept/reject it, but these techniques, when used appropriately can get us close to the truth most of the time (which is a lot better than guessing, flipping coins or throwing darts to get answers).

the tricky part about hypothesis testing is that we have to think somewhat backwards about it – we have to test what is known as the “null hypothesis”. as an example, the hypothesis might be “obama is more popular than romney” while the null hypothesis is “there is no difference in popularity between obama and romney”. we focus on the null hypothesis because it tells us exactly what the expected value of our tests should be (obama popularity = romney popularity) and we can collect data and see if it comes out that way (see next section on “significance”). if it does, then we “accept the null hypothesis” and reject our original hypothesis. if the null hypothesis is disproven, we look at the data to see if our original hypothesis holds (obama> romney).