Explain judicial restraint and the kinds of situations when it often comes into play

Judicial restraint is a position that judges adopt when they purposely limit the exercise of their power. Judicial restraint judges make a cautious approach of their interpretation of laws, normally taking a very conservative position, instead of making decisions that could be considered as controversial. Judicial restraint is the opposite of judicial activism.

For example, a judicial restraint judge is in charge of sentencing a criminal for attempting to rob a bank. He or she revises previous cases and will probably make a sentence of similar proportions to the criminal, basing his or her decision on past sentences.

s the president shall be commander in chief of the army and navy of the united states, and of the militia of the several states, when called into the actual service of the united states; he may require the opinion, in writing, of the principal officer in each of the executive departments. sooo yeahhh

explanation:

answer: andrew johnson

17th u.s. president

in what way were president abraham lincoln's and president andrew johnson's reconstruction plans similar? a)both reserved seats in the congress for former confederate war leaders. b)both granted voting rights to the newly freed slaves. d) both required southerners to support the thirteenth amendment to abolish

explanation: