Why might rulers of command and socailist economies see market-oriented reforms as a threat to their leadership

The reason why the leaders of the countries with command and socialist economies would see the market economies as a threat to their leadership is because they will lose the power they have over the production, the land, the resources, the laborers.

In a market economy, pretty much everything is privately owned, and the government can only be regulating things in accordance to the law, but can not control the profit and the work of the companies. In a command or socialist economy, the leader of the country has total control over everything, thus controlling the whole profit of the country and how everything will be done, so by allowing a market economy, the leader will be directly affected with losing a lot of power from his hands.

to protect the united states' role as a world leader, president truman wanted to prevent the soviet union from spreading communism beyond its post-world war ii boundaries. he declared that the united states must assist any nations struggling to prevent a communist takeover.

the section of the chart that represents a point at which a bill needs approval from a majority of people in both chambers to advance is j, as this is the only section before the bill becomes law which has both rows (symbolizing the chambers) converging into one, meaning that the two parts of the congress have to approve of it before it can march on with the process.