subject
History, 25.06.2019 19:30 ijohnh14

According to the article, in 2002, rhode island had an advisory referendum on whether citizens favored altering the state constitution to make all three branches of government coequal. voters overwhelming voted yes, but the nonbinding referendum did not force legislators to act one way or the other. in a couple of short paragraphs, explain whether you think this type of referendum is useful and beneficial. what are the benefits of having a direct, binding referendum? what are the drawbacks?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 04:00
Explain when conformity is beneficial and when it is harmful. give examples of both?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:30
What was a immediate cause of the panic of 1837
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:00
What evidence is there in this document that the policy was a good idea?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:20
The middle east had been subjected to attacks from outside the middle east in ancient, medieval, and modern times. which of the following invasions by outside forces came last in the period of written middle east history before 1300 a.d.?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
According to the article, in 2002, rhode island had an advisory referendum on whether citizens favor...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 05.07.2019 02:00
question
Mathematics, 05.07.2019 02:00
question
Chemistry, 05.07.2019 02:00
Questions on the website: 13722367