subject
History, 27.06.2019 03:00 griffinbrowning17

Dig news august 2011 last year i went on my first archaeological dig in south america. it was an amazing experience. i had no idea what we might find. as i watched the archaeologists work, i realized how slow and detailed this kind of work could be. it took weeks and even months before we found any clues. finally, my friend's shovel hit a metal object and made a loud noise. she called for . i knew this was something big! when we carefully pulled it out of the ground together, we could hardly believe our eyes. eduardo santana source: flvs which of these describes the source above? it is a secondary source; it was written one year after the event. it is a primary source; it is a firsthand account of finding an artifact. it is a secondary source; it is a description of someone else's discovery. it is a primary source; it was written in a science magazine.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 07:00
Otto von bismarck once said that a great war might someday be caused by some damed foolish thing in the balkans was he right, explain
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:30
What championed nationalism and denounced nullification
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 10:00
Which european nation had the most dominant navy during world war i
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 10:00
Can you describe the american army in 1812?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Dig news august 2011 last year i went on my first archaeological dig in south america. it was an ama...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722360