Give two arguments supporting changing lifetime sentences for minors.

When trying a minor we need to think about all different aspects of the childs developmental habits.

Does the child have a learning disability?

Are they at an age that is not fully developed so they may not have realized what they were doing?

The future is the children and the younger generations, so how can we expect to lock them away for their entire lives and in doing so possible cost the world one of the advencements this child may have made?

There should be some form of a contingency plan on the lifetimes sentence, especially for children under the age of 13.

Good Luck! I hope some of these help!

a woodchuck would chuck 12.5 wood : 3

formulating the initial idea for the policy

answer is c.