In a well-rounded paragraph, analyze the rise of nationalism as seen in the ideas of sun yat sen, mustafa kemal attaturk, and mohandas ghandi. use examples to discuss each leader's ideology and approaches each used to achieve his goal. you may choose to conduct additional independent research to learn more about the leaders, to support your understanding.

At the top of July 1905, Sun Yat Sen returned to Japan from his trip to Europe and also the us. Received with enthusiasm by the Chinese students and regarded the leader of the anti-Manchu revolutionary movement, Sun took advantage of this new popularity to found a brand new political organization. In Tokyo he established the Alliance Society (同盟會, tóngménghuì, strictly, the Society of the Chinese Revolutionary Alliance), that grouped several revolutionary circles. This society would be the embryo from which the Kuomintang, the most party of Chinese nationalism, would turn in 1911. The formation, of which Sun was named president, disputed with the Chinese constitutional monarchists both the favor of the nationalist youth and therefore the backing of the emigration, which the 2 groups disputed. a brand new newspaper for political formation was created at the time, Min Bao (People's Daily).

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, (Thessaloniki, Ottoman Macedonia, May 19, 1881-Istanbul, November 10, 1938), was a politician of the Turkish army and a famous Turkish statesman, also because the founder and first president of the Republic of Turkey. statesman was consecrated as a renowned general commanding a division within the battle of Gallipoli. After the defeat of the Ottoman Empire and also the occupation of Constantinople between 1918 and 1923 at the hands of the Allies and also the partition of the empire, Mustafa Kemal headed the Turkish National Movement, which might cause the Turkish War of Independence.

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi Since 1919 he was openly at the pinnacle of the Indian nationalist movement. He established new methods of social struggle like the nonviolence and in his programs rejected the armed struggle and made a preaching of the ahimsa (nonviolence) as a way to resist British rule. He defended and promoted widely the full fidelity to the dictates of conscience, even reaching direct action if necessary; additionally, he fought for the return to the old Hindu traditions. He corresponded with León Tolstoy, who influenced his concept of passive resistance. He was the inspiration for the march of the salt, an illustration across the country against the taxes to which this product was subject.

Explanation:

deseasie in europe              

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is