Considering the historian's use of source material, which interpretation is most valid? a. a historian uses an unidentified political cartoon published in japan after world war ii in order to draw conclusions about the war's effect on the japanese economy b. a historian cites a japanese newspaper article published a year after the end of world war ii in order to draw conclusions about the effect of the war on the japanese economy c. a historian cites a 2015 blog post by a japanese teenager in order to draw conclusions about japan's economy after world war ii d. a historian uses a book written by japanese world war ii fighter pilot in order to draw conclusions about the war's effect on the japanese economy

B. A historian cites a Japanese newspaper article published a year after the end of World War II in order to draw conclusions about the effect of the war on the Japanese economy

Explanation:

In this case, the historian is actually alluding to a historical source. A Newspaper is also a source of information and it is much more reliable than a random cartoon, a blog post, or an unreliable personal opinion.

From the newspaper, the historian can most likely check opinions from different journalists and the many different things that specialists were saying about the economy of the country back then.

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.

i really really really really really really dont know