How is a concurring opinion different from a dissenting opinion

Concurrent opinion The one issued separately by a judge other than the one who writes the majority opinion, in which he expresses his agreement with the latter. The concurrence may be with the result or with the reasoning of majority opinion, or both.

Dissident opinion is essentially a report by a judicial minority. A dissident may represent the opinions of a single judge or may be accompanied by additional judges. A dissenting opinion does not have a precedent value as such since it can not define with authority a point of law

if a bill passes in the house of representatives, it goes through a similar process in the senate. before a bill becomes law, it must be approved by both chambers of the legislature. the bill must pass with the same wording in the house of representatives and the senate before it can go to the governor for approval.

the right answer is the end of world war ii

after the end of a global wwii all the nations involved, in an attempt to create an organization to maintain world peace. this agreement would work settling international disputes via negotiation and arbitration instead of leading the issues escalate to another war.