Which is these is true of the temperance movement at the beginning of the 1800’s in america

At the beginning of the 1800's, the Temperance Mmovement believed people should decrease the amount of alcohol they drank.

Explanation:

The Temperance Movement criticizes drunkenness and emphasizes the negative consequences of alcohol consumption. Initially, they started from moral arguments. Today, the emphasis is almost entirely on the health effects of drinking. The movement originated in the 1800s in response to increasing drinking and alcoholism. Religious, scientific and progressive discourse mixed with this.

Before 1800, excessive drinking was not considered a social problem. Drinking was a matter that only concerned the drunk and his or her family. This changed during the 1800s as alcohol consumption increased. Industrialization made the production of drinks cheaper, and rising wages also increased disposable income. Alcohol therefore became available to almost everyone, resulting in increasing use. Therefore, the temperance movement came to seek for moderation in alcohol consumption. Only in the late-1800s this claim became a struggle for the total ban on alcohol consumption.

Resistance to excessive alcoholism originally started from moral objections, as there was a strong connection with Protestantism. Religious values such as austerity were invoked to keep people from drinking.

the number of calories in each pack of cookies has a greater variation than the number of calories in each pack of crackers.

separation of powers, therefore, refers to the division of government responsibilities into distinct branches to limit any one branch from exercising the core functions of another.   the intent is to prevent the concentration of power and provide for checks and balances.  

the traditional characterizations of the powers of the branches of american government are:

* the legislative branch is responsible for enacting the laws of the state and appropriating the money necessary to operate the government.

* the executive branch is responsible for implementing and administering the public policy enacted and funded by the legislative branch.

* the judicial branch is responsible for interpreting the constitution and laws and applying their interpretations to controversies brought before it.

forty state constitutions specify that government be divided into three branches:   legislative, executive and judicial.   california illustrates this approach; "the powers of state government are legislative, executive, and judicial.   persons charged with the exercise of one power may not exercise either of the others except as permitted by this constitution."

while separation of powers is key to the workings of american government, no democratic system exists with an absolute separation of powers or an absolute lack of separation of powers. governmental powers and responsibilities intentionally overlap; they are too complex and interrelated to be neatly compartmentalized. as a result, there is an inherent measure of competition and conflict

minnesota:   minnesota house research,   separation of powers: when statutes and court rules conflict, 2005